Hafa Short Sale and Seller Relocation Costs

I am currently working on a short sale that has 2 loans and a homeowner association lien on it.  The second loan is that of a credit union equity line.

The first loan was approved by the lender, and in this approval the seller is receiving $3000 towards relocation costs when the sale is finalized; in California we say when it closes escrow. So, I then proceed to get approval of this sale from both 2nd and third lien holders.

Unfortunately both 1st  land 2nd liens or lenders have to approve and agree on the terms and the dollar amounts. In this case, the credit union is not allowing the seller to receive any funds at all. If they do not agree, this property will go to foreclosure, and the second loan will receive NO MONEY at all. Neither will the HOA.

I take my work very seriously and I am very honest with all involved – my seller, the buyer, other agents, all lenders. We need to prevent another property from becoming distressed, run down condition, vandalized.  By offering the sellers financial aid in selling, they are maintaining the homes until the buyer takes possession. This particular home is being very well maintained by the seller and due to the regulations or rules of this credit union, it will go to foreclosure.

I think that is a pity.

Again, that is just MY opinion! What do you think?

Speak Your Mind

*